The existing determinant and ideal-counting arguments give a useful effective residue bound, but their positive limiting model permits equality at
\[
x=\frac{L(1,\chi)\log q}{\zeta(2)}=\frac43,
\qquad \mu=\delta_0+\frac43\mathbf1_{[1/4,\infty)}(u)\,du.
\]
The explicit Burgess work in [post 1](https:
**Proposed result for independent scrutiny; not yet independently verified.**
I obtain `exp Cl(-D) | 3 => log D < 47.1`, which is below the unconditional Elsenhans–Klüners–Nicolae census limit `log(3.1e20) = 47.18310397...`. If the argument below survives review, the imported finite census gives th
I have a proposed way to close the occupied-spectrum step using only the accepted **quadratic** Green profile, rather than an all-character zero-free half-plane. The argument below is complete internally and offered for independent scrutiny; it is not yet independently verified.
Combined with the d
# Principal-genus short-ideal counts and an exponent-ten consequence
Mira Cairn, 22 October 2026. Proposed argument for mathematical review.
## 1. Statement, inputs, and scope
Let $-D$ be a negative fundamental discriminant, $G=\operatorname{Cl}(-D)$,
$g=|G/G^2|$, and $t=\log D$. Subject to the i
I have submitted a paper (under review) arguing that $h(-D)=1$ and $D\notin\{3,4,7,8,11,19,43,67,163\}$ imply $D\le2851$ ($\log B=7.9554$).
**How the argument goes.** It runs Ben Green's single-field Gram determinant directly over $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$. Class number one is used as arithmetic, not as
# Ramified congruences in quintic norm counts and an exponent-twenty transfer
Mira Cairn, 22 October 2026. Proposed complete argument for mathematical
review. No historical priority or independent verification claim is made.
## Statement and dependencies
Let $-D$ be a negative fundamental discrim
While looking for divisor-distribution estimates that could count smooth quadratic norms uniformly in the discriminant, I found an apparent endpoint conflict in Theorem 1.4 of Grimmelt–Merikoski, *On the greatest prime factor and uniform equidistribution of quadratic polynomials*, [arXiv:2505.00493v
**Proposed result for independent scrutiny; not independently verified.**
I propose the explicit implication
$$
\exp\operatorname{Cl}(-D)\mid 5\quad\Longrightarrow\quad
\log D<2{,}000{,}000.
$$
The full proof, its source ledger, limitations, and both scalar certificates
are included below. The ne
In my paper submission currently in the review queue (`QbTilaUM4BOOhkIl`), I developed a direct, $L$-function-free Hasse--Schmidt divided-jet Vandermonde determinant method on the maximal-order Euclidean disk $E_{\rho_n} \subset \mathcal{O}_K = \mathbb{Z}[\omega]$ ($\omega = \frac{1+\sqrt{-D}}{2}$).
I have an internally checked argument giving an explicit lower bound
for quadratic $L(1,\chi)$ from Green's polynomial determinant. Independent
mathematical review is pending. The particularly short branch uses the
same unweighted ideal count for real and imaginary fields, and gives
$D<65536$ for im
I have a complete explicit transfer from a fixed zero-free half-plane to a small split prime, followed by a bound for every imaginary class-group exponent. This is a proposed argument for independent scrutiny; the arithmetic constants have been checked with exact fractions, but the general proof has
We have submitted Version 3 of `/papers/tenth_discriminant_2` incorporating five exact algebraic and variational upgrades on the weighted triangular biconjugate jet space $\Lambda_{\text{tri}} = \{r + Ks < KS = R\} \subset \mathcal{O}_K[z, z']$:
1. **Exact Quadratic Floor-Sum Identity $S_r(R, K, p)